Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages


October 9, 2019

CASE UPDATE: Current Total of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Exceeds Previous Estimate

4,000 Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Pend in Multidistrict Litigation

More than 4,000 hernia mesh lawsuits against Bard currently pend in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), and more are expected to be filed in upcoming months.

Growing numbers of individuals continue to file lawsuits against hernia mesh manufacturers as patients discover their painful injuries and complications were caused by defective hernia mesh implants.

Experts originally predicted that 3,000 hernia mesh cases would be filed against hernia mesh manufacturer and seller C.R. Bard by the end of 2019. However, a recent pretrial order released October 4 revealed that at least 4,069 product liability lawsuits are filed in the Bard MDL. This includes lawsuits against Bard for design problems with Bard Ventralex, Bard Perfix, Bard Composix, and other Bard polypropylene mesh products. Because many patients injured by mesh implants are not sure of the specific brand or type of implant they received, the litigation will likely continue to grow as hernia mesh lawyers investigate injury claims.

Medical device manufacturer C.R. Bard originally faced only a couple hundred product liability lawsuits at the beginning of 2019. These lawsuits claimed design problems with models of Bard’s hernia mesh implants caused patients to suffer from painful complications.

Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., presiding judge over the Bard hernia mesh litigation, released the current number of lawsuits in a Status Conference on October 1st. The litigation’s Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) estimates that roughly 400 hernia mesh lawsuits are filed on a monthly basis. This number is expected to rise as hernia mesh lawyers continue to review and file claims on behalf of injured hernia mesh implant patients.

Judge Sargus scheduled the next status conference for November 14th. This conference will provide more details on how the Bard litigation is progressing.

Bard Hernia Mesh Implant Litigation

All Bard hernia mesh implant claims pending in the federal court system are centralized before Judge Sargus in the Southern District of Ohio as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL). The MDL was created to help organize and address Bard hernia mesh lawsuits raising the same questions of fact and law.

Earlier this year Judge Sargus created a “bellwether” process to address all current and pending Bard hernia mesh lawsuits. Bellwether processes typically help the court see how juries will react to specific evidence that may be repeatedly presented throughout the trial process.

A small group of representative claims are currently being prepared for a set of early trial dates. They are expected to start between May and September 2020.

While the results of these trials do not determine the outcomes of other claims, they may help both parties work towards a hernia mesh settlement with Bard and other hernia mesh manufacturers. A litigation settlement would help avoid hundreds of individual cases being remanded back to the courts they were originally field in for individual trial dates.

Recent Posts

Massive List of Catholic Clergy Credibly Accused of Sexual Abuse Released

The investigative news source ProPublica compiled and released a thorough list of Catholic clergy credibly accused of sexual abuse, including hundreds of priests from California. ProPublica’s database encompasses all the lists American Catholic religious orders dioceses have released as of about 2018. According to ProPublica’s officials, many American dioceses point to a 2018 Pennsylvania grand […]

Read More
Washington Man Claims Testicular Cancer Was Caused by Chemicals in Firefighting Foams

A complaint filed earlier this month claims toxic “forever” chemicals in firefighting foams caused a man to develop testicular cancer. The claim indicates that the firefighting foam manufacturers withheld safety warnings about the side effects of using aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs). The lawsuit, filed by Mark Austin Goldendale, WA, alleges that he developed testicular cancer […]

Read More

Contact Us Today!

1. We're on Your Side

2. We're Available 24/7

3. No Fees Unless You Win
Northern District of California Logo
state bar of montana logo
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: Not available in all states, Andrew Van Arsdale, supervising attorney is licensed only in California, Montana and Nevada, but associates with attorneys throughout the country, Principal office: 3667 Voltaire Street, San Diego, California 92106. 

Consult a doctor on all medical decisions. Do not stop taking a prescribed medication without first consulting with your doctor. Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor's advice can result in injury or death. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. AVA Law Group, Inc. not accepting cases in states where this advertising conflicts with laws or state rules. Legal representation is not offered or available in Tennessee. While AVA Law Group, Inc. maintains joint responsibility, most cases are referred to other attorneys for principal responsibility.
© Copyright 2019 
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram