Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages


December 19, 2019

Judge Approves Direct Filing of JUUL Injury Lawsuits into Federal MDL

Waves of JUUL Nicotine Addiction Lawsuits Expected in Multidistrict Litigation

In anticipation of increasing numbers of injury and addiction claims against JUUL Labs, a federal judge approves of the direct filing of JUUL lawsuits into the JUUL federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) instead of separate state courts.

Currently, several dozen lawsuits against JUUL Labs, manufacturers of the infamous JUUL e-cigarette and vape pods, pend in district courts nationwide. Each of these claims raise similar allegations against the vape product manufacturer, stating JUUL failed to warn individuals about the dangerous risks of using their products. As lawyers continue to review and file claims on behalf of injured teens and young adults, hundreds of claims are expected to be filed against JUUL in the upcoming months.

Across the U.S., injured individuals claim they developed severe nicotine addictions from using JUUL products. Allegedly, each “JUUL liquid pod” contains the amount of nicotine contained in two packs of regular cigarettes, contributing to users’ crippling addictions. Individuals who have developed severe addictions from “JUULing” say JUUL neglected to adequately warn uses about the risks associated with vaping JUUL pods, removing their right to choose an alternate vape product.

Many of these lawsuits even claim JUUL used deceptive marketing tactics to target teens and young adults, contributing to a widespread youth “JUULing” outbreak. Federal health officials accuse JUUL as being the leading instigator in the U.S. teen vaping epidemic. In fact, the dramatic rise in JUUL’s sales back in 2015 directly correlates with the dramatic increase in the numbers of teens vaping

 So far, parents of injured teens, young adults, and even school districts have filed personal injury lawsuits against the popular e-cigarette manufacturer. More individuals are expected to file claims against JUUL as the litigation progresses and more research is done into the health effects of JUUL e-cigarettes.


Given the rise of lawsuits claiming similar fact and law, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decided to centralize these lawsuits as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California. Centralizing these lawsuits to one location and judge will help address similar cases in a more efficient manner for both plaintiffs and defendants.

In a case management order released on December 13, Judge William H. Orrick III, presiding judge over the JUUL MDL ordered for the direct filing of future JUUL lawsuits into the MDL. By doing so, cases will be direct brought into the Northern District of California, rather than being filed in separate state courts which are later transferred into the MDL. This will aid in cases being addressed and filed in a more timely and efficient manner.

Judge Orrick will likely appoint a select group of JUUL lawyers to leadership positions to help coordinate pre-trial discovery and actions that benefit both parties.  

Recent Posts

U.S. Adds Warning Labels about Dangerous Elmiron Side Effects

After over a year of controversy, U.S. health officials finally added warning labels to the medication Elmiron about the risk of vision loss and potential blindness. Recent studies have found that the popular prescription drug increases users’ likelihood of developing a rare retinal disease known as pigmentary maculopathy. On June 16, the U.S. Food and […]

Read More
Roundup Lawsuit Settlement Reached for 75% of Cancer Claims against Bayer

Pharmaceutical giant Bayer AG announced plans to settle about 75% of the current claims against them alleging Roundup weed killer caused users to develop cancer. Currently Bayer and its subsidiary Monsanto company face over 125,000 product liability lawsuits in a massive Roundup herbicide litigation. On June 24, Bayer revealed in a company statement that the […]

Read More

Contact Us Today for your free, in-depth case evaluation

We're on Your Side
We're available 24/7
no fees unless you win

Free in-depth 
no obligation case evaluation

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: Not available in all states, Andrew Van Arsdale, supervising attorney is licensed only in California, Montana and Nevada, but associates with attorneys throughout the country, Principal office: 3667 Voltaire Street, San Diego, California 92106. 

Consult a doctor on all medical decisions. Do not stop taking a prescribed medication without first consulting with your doctor. Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor's advice can result in injury or death. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. AVA Law Group, Inc. not accepting cases in states where this advertising conflicts with laws or state rules. Legal representation is not offered or available in Tennessee. While AVA Law Group, Inc. maintains joint responsibility, most cases are referred to other attorneys for principal responsibility.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram