Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

FOLLOW US: 

September 19, 2019

Litigation enters Tolling Agreement for 3M Earplug Lawsuits

According to a court order released August 26, the 3M earplug multidistrict litigation (MDL) has made significant developments, including entering into a tolling agreement for certain 3M earplug lawsuits. A tolling agreement is an agreement between both parties that they have waived the right to claim that a lawsuit should be dismissed because the statute of limitations have expired for it.

Currently there are over 2,000 3M earplug lawsuits filed nationwide, brought forth by former military members. Each of the product liability lawsuits claim similar allegations, that 3M’s Combat Arms earplugs were defective and did not provide adequate ear protection. These earplugs were distributed to US military members between 2003 and 2015, and some suggest that nearly 100,000 servicemembers could be filing 3M earplug lawsuits in the upcoming months and years.

U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers, who presides over all 3M earplug lawsuits centralized in the Northern District of Florida, announced the tolling agreement in a case management order released after a conference earlier this week. The tolling agreement will also give the Court and manufactur with more information and a more definitive count of the number of pending 3M earplug claims filed and unfiled nationwide.

In addition to the tolling agreement, the case management order stated the document discovery progress was going well, and the manufacturer is on schedule to complete the majority of document production by September 30. The order also announced the schedule for future case management conferences:

  • September 27
  • October 25
  • November 22
  • December 16

Experts anticipate Judge Rodgers will create a “bellwether” process to handle the claims currently pending in the 3M earplug litigation.  However, if parties fail to reach a 3M earplug settlement to resolve the litigation, each claim could be remanded back to the U.S. District Courts they were originally filed in for future, individual trial dates.

Recent Posts

Massive List of Catholic Clergy Credibly Accused of Sexual Abuse Released

The investigative news source ProPublica compiled and released a thorough list of Catholic clergy credibly accused of sexual abuse, including hundreds of priests from California. ProPublica’s database encompasses all the lists American Catholic religious orders dioceses have released as of about 2018. According to ProPublica’s officials, many American dioceses point to a 2018 Pennsylvania grand […]

Read More
Washington Man Claims Testicular Cancer Was Caused by Chemicals in Firefighting Foams

A complaint filed earlier this month claims toxic “forever” chemicals in firefighting foams caused a man to develop testicular cancer. The claim indicates that the firefighting foam manufacturers withheld safety warnings about the side effects of using aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs). The lawsuit, filed by Mark Austin Goldendale, WA, alleges that he developed testicular cancer […]

Read More

Contact Us Today for your free, in depth case evaluation

We're on Your Side
We're Available 24/7
No fees unless you win

Free in-depth 
case evaluation

Contact Us Today!

1. We're on Your Side

2. We're Available 24/7

3. No Fees Unless You Win
Northern District of California Logo
state bar of montana logo
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: Not available in all states, Andrew Van Arsdale, supervising attorney is licensed only in California, Montana and Nevada, but associates with attorneys throughout the country, Principal office: 3667 Voltaire Street, San Diego, California 92106. 

Consult a doctor on all medical decisions. Do not stop taking a prescribed medication without first consulting with your doctor. Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor's advice can result in injury or death. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. AVA Law Group, Inc. not accepting cases in states where this advertising conflicts with laws or state rules. Legal representation is not offered or available in Tennessee. While AVA Law Group, Inc. maintains joint responsibility, most cases are referred to other attorneys for principal responsibility.
© Copyright 2020 
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
twitter-squarefacebook-squarephoneyoutube-playinstagramenvelopephone-handsetmap-marker
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram