AngioDynamics port catheters, such as the LifePort, Vortex, and Xcela models, are designed to provide convenient and durable vascular access. However, mounting evidence suggests that these devices suffer from critical design flaws. Patients have reported serious complications, including:
The issues often stem from materials like barium sulfate, which degrade over time and create rough surfaces prone to clot formation and structural failure. Despite being aware of these risks, manufacturers allegedly failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers.
To address the growing number of claims, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized federal AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Southern District of California, under U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta. An MDL (Multi-District Litigation) is a special legal process that consolidates similar cases to streamline pretrial proceedings, ensuring efficiency and consistency in handling complex litigation.
Andrew Van Arsdale, a distinguished attorney and founder of AVA Law Group and advocate for injured individuals from product liability, is co-leading this MDL. His leadership role is a testament to his expertise and dedication to representing plaintiffs’ interests during these critical proceedings.
AboutLawsuits.com: AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in MDL
AboutLawsuits.com: AngioDynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing
Most lawsuits filed against AngioDynamics focus on product liability, alleging defects in the design, manufacturing, or marketing of these devices. Key claims include:
Design Defects: Inherent flaws in the device design that make them unsafe for their intended purpose.
Manufacturing Defects: Errors during production that compromise the structural integrity of the catheter.
Failure to Warn: Inadequate warnings or instructions about the risks associated with the device.
Some cases also involve allegations of fraudulent concealment, where manufacturers are accused of underreporting adverse events to regulatory agencies like the FDA.
Victims of defective port catheters may be entitled to compensation for:
Each case is unique, and the outcome depends on proving that the device’s defects directly caused the harm experienced.
The statute of limitations for filing a port catheter lawsuit varies by state but typically ranges from 2 to 3 years from the date of injury or discovery. Delaying action may jeopardize your ability to seek compensation. Our legal team offers free consultations to determine your eligibility and guide you through the process.
At AVA Law Group, we are committed to helping individuals harmed by defective medical devices. With Andrew Van Arsdale’s prominent co-leadership role in the AngioDynamics MDL, we are uniquely positioned to provide exceptional representation for your case. Our team will work tirelessly to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you deserve.
Contact us today at 406-333-3333 or email support@avalaw.com to schedule your free consultation.
